It has been some time since the Dark Lord made himself known to the Austrian wizarding world. His DeathEaters have been roaming the earth, striking fear in the hearts of wizards and muggles alike. The Ministry’s across the world are turning to Austria for help, for advice on how to take care of their unwelcome guests. Minister Wagner has been newly appointed with the hopes that he will find a way to rid the world of the Dark Lord and his DeathEaters. He brings with him a fresh perspective and a good track record of completing anything he sets his mind to. This change in leadership has Austrians excited, hoping that soon they will be able to walk out of their homes without any concerns of a Dark Lord, no wondering where he will strike next, if at all.
Because that is the question on everyone’s mind. It has been a year since the Dark Lord himself has made an appearance, since he has launched a large attack on the world or made an attempt at overthrowing the Ministry. Most people have assumed he was in hiding, allowing his DeathEaters to do his dirty work. However, as the activity of the DeathEaters slows, rumors are spreading that the Dark Lord has resigned himself from destroying the Ministry. Even his DeathEaters are beginning to grow tired of wreaking havoc with no end game. Is he trying to lead the wizarding world into a false sense of security with the recent calm or has the Dark Lord really left?
Only the DeathEaters now know the truth. There is a new Dark Lord. Godfrey Dunhill has taken his place as Dark Lord, overthrowing the inactive Darren Morgan. Even though he has just come to power, he already has a plan in the works. Soon he will make his name known. Soon he will show the wizarding world across the globe that he has no intentions of losing. But what does he want? What is it that he’s looking to gain? And, the ultimate question. What side of this battle will you choose?
I can't remember exactly how it goes, but apparently it was a exam question or something. A young childs Gran mother passes away and he tells his teacher he can talk to her still. The teacher tells him thats not right, ghosts aren't real and he needs help. The child tells his mother the same thing, she tells him that she believes him. When he's older he goes on a killing spree, who's fault is it? The teacher? Or the mother?
Neither of them. Although, the teacher should never have told him that and crash his beliefs because beliefs can't be taught so no teacher has the right to actually tell you differently. And the mothers, most definatly not because she is only looking out for her son and wants him to be happy so she tells him what he wants to hear. And truely no one can go on a killing spree just from someone tell him what's real and whats not. Because truely, it have never been proven if you can talk to the dead anyways. Now what he should have done is gone and proved his teacher wrong if it was such a big deal to him. He should have told her straight out that she can't tell him things she's doesn't know.
I wouldn't blame either of them since it might not have been about that and if it was the kid had problems before they got to him, thinking he can hear his dead gran and all.
I don’t believe either was at fault for his behavior. It’s irresponsible for a person to pass the blame onto another person when they themselves knew exactly what they were doing. To even think of blaming either is irrational and pretty much unfounded, you would have to put up a very good bases of a ground argument to even think of putting blame on either one of them. People who murder others, are simply sick in the head or have some kind of chemical imbalance, and something like that can never be passed up as another persons fault.
Did they put the weapon in his hand? Were they ones who planted the idea of murder and killing into his head? I don’t think so. There could have been various other incidents in his life that lead him to do something. Maybe he could talk to his grandmother, many young children are capable of it and I believe that. It could also be that he was just so traumatized by the passing of someone he was close to that he implanted the idea into his own head that she was still there, talking to him.
In a sense his way of coping with her loss and therefore he was making it as though she never left. Something like that could do major harm to his psychological state of mind, and with out a person to speak to him, it could have turned into something more which in turn resulted in him being –pardon my terminology- so screwed up. That in the end could simply be why he did something so horrible. The blame can not be placed either on parent nor Teacher, its most likely a case of a Childs way of coping with death gone horribly wrong. Such cases have been known to happen, he convinces himself of something and it further damages his way of thinking which turns him into a senseless person who could possibly have no idea of reality and invented thought.